Who this is for — Readers relating annualised growth to the worst observed peak-to-trough fall while keeping the interval, wealth curve and conventions identical.
The Calmar ratio compares annualised return with the absolute magnitude of maximum drawdown over the same period:
Calmar = annualised return / |MDD|In contemporary use the numerator is often CAGR. The metric belongs to the return-to-drawdown family: it replaces volatility with one path-dependent feature. It does not measure average loss, drawdown frequency or the probability of a future event.
Sources and providers use variants in numerator, sign and window. Cyclepedia therefore does not turn a historically common duration such as 36 months into a rule. Every convention must be stated.
The numerator
For positive opening value Vᵢ, positive closing value
V_f and duration Y in years:
CAGR = (V_f / Vᵢ)^(1/Y) − 1CAGR is a compound equivalent, not the arithmetic mean of annual returns. With external flows, raw account-balance CAGR confuses contributions and performance. Price/total-return basis, gross/net status, currency and cost must match the curve used for drawdown. Variants subtracting a risk-free rate or using another annual average are not directly comparable with CAGR/MDD.
The denominator
Signed drawdown is:
DDₜ = Wₜ / max_{u≤t}(Wᵤ) − 1Calmar normally uses positive magnitude |MDD|. If observed MDD is
zero, the ratio is undefined. Adding an arbitrary small denominator to publish
a finite number creates a new metric.
MDD is one extreme observation. Start date, valuation frequency and window can change both peak and trough; a shorter record has fewer opportunities to contain a severe drawdown.
Example
A hypothetical portfolio grows from 100 to 121 in two years without external flows. CAGR is:
(121/100)^(1/2) − 1 = 10%Its maximum drawdown over the same interval is −20%, so under the CAGR/absolute- MDD convention:
Calmar = 10% / 20% = 0.50Analysing only year two could change both numbers. The value 0.50 belongs to no universal band and does not predict the next drawdown.
Comparable calculations
Two ratios need matching start and end dates or, with care, the same length and regime; valuation frequency and calendar; currency and hedging; price/total- return basis; flow treatment; costs, fees and taxes; annualised-return formula; MDD definition and sign; and live, composite or simulated status.
An intraday gross backtest and a monthly net fund series are not comparable: the first observes finer troughs while the second may contain fees and delayed marks.
Calmar, Sharpe and Sortino
| Ratio | Denominator | Main property |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe | standard deviation of differential return | uses the full periodic distribution |
| Sortino | downside deviation below a target | depends on MAR and shortfalls |
| Calmar | maximum drawdown | depends on return order and one observed extreme |
No ratio dominates every context. Sharpe may penalise upside dispersion; Sortino may have too few shortfalls; Calmar may be driven by one episode. Using several measures exposes useful contradictions but does not create a universal score.
Limitations and reporting
Calmar is window-dependent; ignores the rest of the drawdown distribution and underwater duration; can favour short or smoothed track records; does not correct liquidity, unobserved tails or selection bias; is unstable with a small denominator; is not additive; and does not separate leverage, factors, luck and skill.
Magdon-Ismail and Atiya show that MDD scaling changes with drift and horizon under specific models. No universal transformation can therefore align Calmar across windows.
A complete report includes formula and window, wealth curve, numerator, peak and trough dates, decline and recovery duration, open drawdowns, flows and costs, a like-for-like benchmark, the broader drawdown distribution and its ex-post nature.
Common error — Using five-year CAGR with a three-year MDD. Numerator and denominator must come from the same curve and interval.
Sources
- CFA Institute, Sculpting Investment Portfolios: Maximum Drawdown and Optimal Portfolio Strategy — contemporary CAGR/MDD definition and window-comparison issues.
- CFA Institute, Portfolio Performance Evaluation — 2026 refresher reading — maximum drawdown, duration and appraisal limitations.
- Malik Magdon-Ismail and Amir F. Atiya, Maximum Drawdown, Risk (2004) — relationships among MDD, return and measures such as Calmar.
- Malik Magdon-Ismail et al., On the Maximum Drawdown of a Brownian Motion, Journal of Applied Probability (2004) — dependence of drawdown on horizon and process.
- GIPS Standards, Handbook for Firms — return, valuation, flow and disclosure bases required for a comparable series.