Skip to content
James Marsden Hurst 1924—2005
Chapter 6.4 Calculate Your Own Way

Case Alloys Unlimited

Four consecutive predictions with half-span and full-span averages alone: zones 48–52, 33½–36½, 50⅝–54⅛ and 39⅜–41⅞ — outcomes 48¾, 35⅛, 52⅞ and 41. Chapter 6's test bench.

Who this entry is for — Chapter 1's stock returns as the computational method's test bench: four half-span reversals, four predicted zones, four outcomes inside the zone. With the numbers, one by one.

Source: J. M. Hurst, The Profit Magic of Stock Transaction Timing, Prentice-Hall, 1970 — Chapter 6 (pp. 99–112, Figs. VI-1/VI-8). Measured trading cycle: 17–22 weeks, assumed 20 (half-span 10, full-span 20).


Prerequisites

Half-span and full-span — the method here put to the test four times in a row.


The four predictions

In plain words — Every time the 10-week average turns: extrapolation to the crossing, leg already done, symmetric target, ±10% zone. Then you watch what the stock does.

# The half-span… Crossing Leg done Predicted zone Outcome
1 bottoms 41 from 32: 9 points 48–52 (target 50) zone entered 8 weeks later, top at 48¾
2 tops 42 from 48¾: 7 points 33½–36½ (target 35) zone 4 weeks later, low at 35⅛
3 bottoms 43¾ from 35⅛: 8⅝ 50⅝–54⅛ (target 52⅜) price "rocketed" into the zone the next week, three weeks inside, top at 52⅞
4 tops 46¾ from the top: 6⅛ 39⅜–41⅞ (target 40⅝) zone 2 weeks later, low at 41

Nor were the predictions academic: the first generates a "hold" (~9 more points of upside), the second a sell/sell-short at ~47–48, the third — after covering and re-buying at ~37, possible "any time within a five-week interval" — another hold to the zone, the fourth the comfort for the short opened at 51–52 while price had "refused to go down" for nine weeks.

Original figure temporarily withheld while publication rights are verified.
The original 1970 plate: Alloys Unlimited with the averages compared (Fig. III-10; plates VI-1/VI-7 develop the sequence).

The finest moment: the turn seen in advance

In plain words — After the 32⅛ low the chart was ambiguous: a lower high, the channel apparently still down. Not the full-span: it was rising. And if the long sum rises, the channel has bottomed.

This is where the computational method "sees" before the envelopes: the 48¾ cycle high was lower than the preceding 49¾ — suspicion of a still-bearish channel. But the 20-week average was "definitely up": the sum of everything longer than 20 weeks pointed up, so the 20-week channel had to have bottomed at the 32⅛ low and was curving upward. Envelope analysis alone could say so only when the next top was confirmed at 52⅞ — "a full three weeks later".

And when the 51–52 short seemed not to pay, the inverse closed the circle: the 12.7-week cycle and the 21.7-week trading cycle both heading for lows → estimate 40½ against the half-span's 40⅝. Actual low: 41, the next week.

Warning — The book itself tempers expectations: "it will not always provide as much information as in this example". The timing estimate in particular is rough (5 weeks predicted against 9 observed, in the worst case). The order stands: graphics first, the computational ruler as confirmation — and Chapter 5's whole defensive armoury always on the field.


Summary card

Number Value
Trading cycle 17–22 weeks → assumed 20
Averages Half-span 10 · full-span 20 (smoothing a 12-week remnant)
Correct predictions 4 of 4 inside the ±10% zone
Misses on target 48¾ vs 50 · 35⅛ vs 35 · 52⅞ vs 52⅜ · 41 vs 40⅝
The added value The channel turn seen 3 weeks before the envelopes