Condensed case — Short version of the full CBOT Study Guide Part V case (August–September 1991). For minus development, six critical questions, and LDB → linked methodology entries.
Source: CBOT, Market Profile Home Study Guide (1996), Part V — soybean futures Aug–Sep 1991 case. Raw:
raw/patrimonio-emiciclo/studio-steidlmayer/cbot/part-05-decisioni-trading.
Context
Steidlmayer uses soybean futures to show how the six critical questions (price vs activity control, capital flow, control price across three timeframes, near-term activity, market condition) yield replicable decisions. The case shows an apparent rally can be only long-period value area rotation, not a new trend.
Three timeframes
| Timeframe | Period | Control / VA | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long | Feb–Jul 1991 | ~560; VA ~600 & ~571 | Balanced market |
| Intermediate | 22 Aug–11 Sep | ~587; unfair low 572, high 597½ | New unit, capital in 22 Aug |
| Near-term | 12–27 Sep | 611½ then break | Operational sequence below |
Sequence (12–27 September)
- 13/9 — 618 top test fails; value develops above 600 → 600 holds as floor in LP frame.
- 16/9 — New beginning from mean; buying above 600 → possible long ~602½, minus development supportive.
- 17/9–18/9 — Rally toward 618; resistance above, no strong confirmed buying → minus development turns down.
- 19/9–20/9 — Market fails to return to 611½ (near-term control); breaks control; new down beginning (H period) → short.
- 25/9–27/9 — Return to intermediate control price (587), tightly balanced → ready for new directional move.
Outcome / Lesson
The 618 test and pullback were, in the long-period frame, LP VA rotation — not trend breakout. By mid-October the market was below 560 testing 546: failed breakout confirmed the longest timeframe control price commands all others.
Card — Rules extracted
- Development (price control) → fade; distribution (activity control) → go with.
- Minus development shows flow direction, not precise timing.
- Always cross MP chart with LDB / CTI2 when available.