Who this is for — Anyone who wants the long-short balance under a precise convention without mistaking it for universal neutrality.
Net exposure is the signed sum of exposures Eᵢ expressed in the same
unit:
N = ∑ᵢ Eᵢ; N / NAV = ∑ᵢ Eᵢ / NAVIf Eᵢ is market value for cash positions in one currency, the
result is monetary net exposure. If Eᵢ is beta-adjusted, delta equivalent or DV01,
the result measures the balance of that specific sensitivity. Changing the unit
changes the question and may change the sign of the result.
Net with respect to what?
| Convention | Balance described | What it does not guarantee |
|---|---|---|
| market value | dollar/euro longs minus shorts | beta neutrality |
| beta-adjusted | linear sensitivity to a benchmark | sector or nonlinear neutrality |
| delta-adjusted | local sensitivity to an underlying | gamma, vega or gap neutrality |
| DV01 | sensitivity to a small rate move | curve, spread or convexity neutrality |
| currency | balance against an exchange rate | offset of other factors |
| scenario | net P&L under one stated shock | outcome under different scenarios |
A cash portfolio long 120 and short 120 has zero monetary net and gross 240. If the two legs have different betas, sectors, liquidity or currencies, the portfolio can remain strongly directional to those factors. “Market-neutral” is therefore a property to define and test, not an automatic synonym for near- zero monetary net exposure.
Net exposure and netting are different
Market net exposure is an analytical aggregation of positions. Legal netting instead determines which receivables and payables can be offset after default under enforceable agreements and a specified netting set. Two positions that offset economically may not offset legally; conversely, a netting agreement does not remove basis, liquidity or residual market risk.
There is no universal cap for net exposure. A limit should be expressed in the sensitivity the mandate seeks to control and accompanied by gross exposure, concentrations and scenario losses.
Common mistake — Adding equities, options and bonds as signed notional and calling the result “effective directional risk”. A common economic basis and the relevant sensitivities must come first.
Checklist
- State the exposure basis, currency, benchmark and date.
- Calculate gross and net from the same population of positions.
- Keep beta, delta, DV01, currency and scenario balances separate.
- Retest sensitivities after market moves and rebalancing.
- Record legal netting, collateral and counterparties separately.
Sources
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Division of Economic and Risk Analysis, Use of Derivatives by Registered Investment Companies — limitations of notional offsetting and the role of delta-adjusted notional and other comparison bases.
- Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, MAR21 — Standardised approach: sensitivities-based method — separate aggregation of sensitivities by risk factor and class.
- Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, CRE52 — Standardised approach to counterparty credit risk — counterparty exposure by netting set and treatment of recognised offsets.
- Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, CRE54 — Exposures to central counterparties — legal-enforceability requirements for close-out netting, distinct from economic offsetting.