Skip to content

Relative strength (Wyckoff)

Stock-to-index comparison: step 2 of the method, buying test 7 and selling test 4, useful when assessing reaccumulation and distribution.

Cite this entry

This reference cites the Cyclepedia entry. The documents it draws on are listed in the entry’s sources.

Who this entry is for — Anyone picking «strong» stocks by looking at the chart in isolation. Wyckoff compares the candidate with the index: in markup the method seeks leaders; in markdown it seeks laggards. This is one of the filters used to distinguish reaccumulation from distribution, not a confirmation on its own.

Source and level — Relative strength is treated here as a stock-to-market comparison in modern Wyckoff teaching. Test numbering and ratio interpretation remain source- and context-dependent.

Reference basis: modern Wyckoff teaching documents the stock-to-market comparison in step 2. In the checklist reproduced by StockCharts it is buying test 7 and selling test 4, so the number is not the same on both sides. Full references appear at the end of this entry.


Prerequisites

Five Wyckoff steps (step 2 — Selection) and Three laws.


Definition

In plain terms — Does the stock rise more than the market and fall less? It has relative strength and may become a long candidate if structure and context agree. Does it rise less and fall more? It has relative weakness and may become a short candidate under the same conditions. The tide matters as much as the wave.

Relative strength in Wyckoff measures whether a stock outperforms or underperforms the reference index (S&P 500, FTSE MIB, sector) under the same market conditions. It is not Wilder's Relative Strength Index (RSI): it is a visual comparison or a ratio. The stock and index charts can be placed side by side, or the stock/index ratio can be observed; that ratio rises when the stock outperforms. In step 2 of the five-step approach, the Wyckoff tradition looks for long candidates with accumulation structure and relative leadership; for shorts, it looks for distribution and relative weakness. In the modern checklist reproduced by StockCharts, the comparison is buying test 7 and selling test 4.

Bias Relative strength required Operational signal
Long / accumulation Stock ↑ more than index; pullback ↓ less Bullish harmony
Short / distribution Stock ↓ more than index; rally ↑ less Bearish harmony
Reaccumulation vs distribution Leadership in markup strengthens the reaccumulation hypothesis Weakness after a rally strengthens the distribution hypothesis

Example — The index falls 3% in two weeks while stock A falls 0.8% over the same period and shows a reaccumulation range with an internal spring. Relative strength supports the reaccumulation hypothesis, but does not confirm it by itself. Stock B falls 3% like the index inside a «similar» range after a rally: the lack of leadership weakens the bullish hypothesis; structure, volume and market phase must decide.


How to measure it in practice

  1. Normalised overlay — same starting point on stock and index; whoever pulls away upward wins.
  2. Ratio line — stock/index rising = strength; falling = weakness.
  3. Wave comparison — highs, lows, rallies and reactions in the stock are compared with the corresponding points in the index; the stock's volume is read together with its own structure.

Relative strength does not replace Wyckoff structure (phases A–E, spring, SOS): a strong stock in a generally distributive market remains a risky long — step 1 takes priority.

Common mistake — Declaring «reaccumulation» on a range that looks constructive but underperforms the index for weeks. Without a relative-strength comparison, market context and the range structure, that label is not justified: the range could also be distribution.


Summary card

Step 2 (selection); buying test 7 and selling test 4
Tool Comparative charts or stock/index ratio
Long Relative leader
Short Relative laggard
Key uses Selection and a consistency check on the structure

Sources